LSAT PrepTest 19 Section 24 Question 5 Explanation | Logical Reasoning
I didn't write the following blog post. It was already on the blog when I took over the URL. The following blog post may contain mistake...
https://iskablogs.blogspot.com/2005/05/lsat-preptest-19-section-24-question-5.html
I didn't write the following blog post. It was already on the blog when I took over the URL. The following blog post may contain mistakes. -Steve*** This Logical Reasoning question is from the June 1996 LSAT.In the stimulus, the prosecution never says there never WAS any evidence supporting the defendant. It simply says there IS no evidence supporting the defendant.The problem: this is consistent
