NHTSA Proposal Will Require Different MPG for Different Companies
The NHTSA proposal to increase fuel economy standards by 2015 to 31.6 mpg keeps getting stranger. As analysts wade through the (over) 400 ...
https://iskablogs.blogspot.com/2008/04/nhtsa-proposal-will-require-different.html
The NHTSA proposal to increase fuel economy standards by 2015 to 31.6 mpg keeps getting stranger. As analysts wade through the (over) 400 page document, the following little tidbit has been discovered. It seems that because car manufacturers have different mixes of vehicle sizes, and the new rules are being set based on size of the car (footprint), each manufacturer will end up with a different standard to pass before they face any penalties.
Required CAFE Levels (mpg) for Passenger Cars
Required CAFE Levels (mpg) for Light Trucks
As you can see, the larger companies, because of their mix of cars, are going to have lower standards to pass than the smaller companies. Lotus, for instance, will need to get up over 38.1 mpg in 2011, while at the other end of the spectrum, Chrysler only has to get 28.7 mpg.
The NHTSA estimates that if each manufacturer meets the minimum requirements each year, they industry wide average for mpg will reach 31.6 mpg by MY 2015.
MY 2011: 27.8 mpg
MY 2012: 29.2 mpg
MY 2013: 30.5 mpg
MY 2014: 31.0 mpg
MY 2015: 31.6 mpg
The proposal also outlines the ways the manufacturers could meet their obligations, specifically, by using fuel saving technologies. The NHTSA estimates the mix of technologies could look like the following for the seven major manufacturers by MY 2015. The following table shows both an average and a maximum value of technology penetration.
Estimated Technology Penetration Rates in MY2015 for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks
I'm very surprised to see the low rates for diesel cars, but not by the high rate of hybrid electric vehicles being projected.
Required CAFE Levels (mpg) for Passenger Cars
Manufacturer | MY 2011 | MY 2012 | MY 2013 | MY 2014 | MY 2015 |
BMW | 33.3 | 35 | 36 | 36.8 | 37.7 |
Chrysler | 28.7 | 29.3 | 32.2 | 32.6 | 33.6 |
Ferrari | 30.4 | 32 | 33.1 | 33.9 | 34.9 |
Ford | 31 | 32.7 | 33.7 | 34.5 | 35.5 |
Fuji (Subaru) | 36.9 | 38.7 | 39.6 | 40.1 | 40.8 |
General Motors | 30 | 31.7 | 32.8 | 33.7 | 34.7 |
Honda | 32.1 | 33.8 | 34.8 | 35.5 | 36.4 |
Hyundai | 33.4 | 35.1 | 36 | 36.7 | 37.5 |
Lotus | 38.1 | 40 | 40.8 | 41.2 | 41.7 |
Maserati | 28.9 | 30.6 | 31.8 | 32.8 | 34 |
Mercedes | 31.7 | 33.3 | 34.4 | 35.3 | 36.2 |
Mitsubishi | 33 | 35.1 | 35.9 | 37 | 37.9 |
Nissan | 31.2 | 33.2 | 34.2 | 35 | 35.9 |
Porsche | 37.6 | 39.4 | 40.3 | 40.7 | 41.3 |
Suzuki | 37.3 | 39.2 | 40.1 | 40.6 | 41.2 |
Toyota | 30.1 | 31.5 | 32.7 | 33.6 | 34.6 |
Volkswagen | 35.4 | 37.2 | 38.2 | 38.8 | 39.5 |
Total/Average | 31.2 | 32.8 | 34 | 34.8 | 35.7 |
Required CAFE Levels (mpg) for Light Trucks
Manufacturer | MY 2011 | MY 2012 | MY 2013 | MY 2014 | MY 2015 |
BMW | 28.2 | 29.9 | 31.2 | 31.4 | 31.7 |
Chrysler | 25.2 | 26.6 | 28 | 28.5 | 29.1 |
Ford | 24.7 | 26.1 | 28 | 28.3 | 28.8 |
Fuji (Subaru) | 30 | 31.7 | 33.1 | 33.2 | 33.4 |
General Motors | 23.9 | 25.4 | 26.5 | 27 | 27.4 |
Honda | 26.1 | 27.7 | 28.9 | 29.2 | 29.6 |
Hyundai | 27.5 | 29.1 | 30.4 | 30.6 | 31 |
Mercedes | 28.4 | 30.1 | 31.4 | 31.6 | 31.9 |
Mitsubishi | 29.4 | 30.8 | 32.2 | 32.3 | 32.6 |
Nissan | 24.9 | 26.2 | 27.3 | 27.7 | 28.2 |
Porsche | 25.9 | 27.4 | 28.7 | 29 | 29.4 |
Suzuki | 30.3 | 32.1 | 33.5 | 33.5 | 33.7 |
Toyota | 24.9 | 26 | 27.2 | 27.6 | 28 |
Volkswagen | 26.2 | 27.8 | 29 | 29.3 | 29.7 |
Total/Average | 25 | 26.4 | 27.8 | 28.2 | 28.6 |
As you can see, the larger companies, because of their mix of cars, are going to have lower standards to pass than the smaller companies. Lotus, for instance, will need to get up over 38.1 mpg in 2011, while at the other end of the spectrum, Chrysler only has to get 28.7 mpg.
The NHTSA estimates that if each manufacturer meets the minimum requirements each year, they industry wide average for mpg will reach 31.6 mpg by MY 2015.
MY 2011: 27.8 mpg
MY 2012: 29.2 mpg
MY 2013: 30.5 mpg
MY 2014: 31.0 mpg
MY 2015: 31.6 mpg
The proposal also outlines the ways the manufacturers could meet their obligations, specifically, by using fuel saving technologies. The NHTSA estimates the mix of technologies could look like the following for the seven major manufacturers by MY 2015. The following table shows both an average and a maximum value of technology penetration.
Estimated Technology Penetration Rates in MY2015 for Passenger Cars and Light Trucks
Average Among Seven Largest Manufacturers | Maximum Among Seven Largest Manufacturers | |||||
Passenger Cars | Product Plan | Adjusted Baseline | Under Proposed Standard | Product Plan | Adjusted Baseline | Under Proposed Standard |
Automatically Shifted Manual Transmission | 10% | 10% | 39% | 59% | 59% | 86% |
Spark Ignited Direct Injection | 22% | 22% | 30% | 76% | 76% | 82% |
Turbocharging & Engine Downsizing | 5% | 5% | 17% | 11% | 11% | 51% |
Diesel Engine | 0% | 0% | 2% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
Hybrid Electric Vehicles | 5% | 5% | 15% | 14% | 14% | 19% |
Light Trucks | ||||||
Automatically Shifted Manual Transmission | 10% | 14% | 55% | 41% | 41% | 72% |
Spark Ignited Direct Injection | 23% | 24% | 40% | 46% | 46% | 73% |
Turbocharging & Engine Downsizing | 9% | 11% | 31% | 32% | 32% | 44% |
Diesel Engine | 3% | 6% | 10% | 7% | 29% | 45% |
Hybrid Electric Vehicles | 2% | 6% | 25% | 5% | 13% | 32% |
I'm very surprised to see the low rates for diesel cars, but not by the high rate of hybrid electric vehicles being projected.